Investment Magazine
 

GESB gains control of fixed-income portfolio

  • 30 April, 2012
  • 0
  • print

Moving away from aggregate or composite-bond portfolios that mix credit and sovereign debt to awarding specific mandates will give the $12.8 billion Government Employees Superannuation Board (GESB) greater control of its fixed income portfolio.

GESB recently announced $2.28 billion of new fixed-income mandates to three managers, and a wide-ranging restructure of its fixed-income portfolio.

Steve McKenna, acting chief investment officer at the Perth-based fund, says that splitting its fixed-income portfolio into global government bonds and global investment-grade bonds was a reaction to the some of the difficulties the fund experienced in 2007 with its credit exposures and would help manage current concerns around sovereign risk.

“In 2007, the way GESB had its fixed-income investments arranged was generally in aggregate and composite-bond portfolios that mixed sovereign debt and credit and what that meant was that it was in the managers’ ability to change the mix between sovereign and credit – not really a lever that we could pull at the GESB level,” he says.

McKenna says that the old aggregate-style portfolios limited the fund’s capacity to move considerably away from a manager’s benchmark when wanting to change the underlying mix of credit and sovereign debt.

“Back in 2007 it turned out credit was the issue and that was the thing you really wanted to avoid. Fast forward to 2011/12 and a lot of the problems are in sovereigns.”

McKenna, who as well as performing the role of acting-chief investment officer also develops strategies for GESB’s fixed income, alternatives and cash asset classes, says the new structure also attempts to deal with inherent flaws in bond indices.

Pages: 1 2

© Copyright: Whole articles from this website and newsletter cannot be reproduced without permission from the editor. If you wish to publish introductions to any article please ensure that it links to original content site www.investmentmagazine.com.au, and that it shows clear attribution to Investment Magazine, plus author name and date. Failure to abide by this request will be considered a breach of copyright and legal action will be taken.

Vote
Do you prefer the term non-affiliated or non-associated to independent board member?
 

Online service most highly rated

HESTA was the top-scoring fund in a survey of member-satisfaction levels carried out by CoreData Consulting, which has highlighted the need for more tailored ... [more]

Product important at Sunsuper

Sunsuper has boosted its product division, appointing three senior managers in newly created roles. The division, created last year to centralise the super ... [more]

ASIC strategy: targeted surveillance

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) will be taking a targeted surveillance approach to how superannuation funds undertake intra-fund advice, with particular ... [more]

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid ... [more]

Opposition to delay SG rise

The Coalition has said it will delay the increase of the super guarantee from 9 per cent to 12 per cent if it ... [more]

Pipes, ports and power

One of the best reasons for investing in infrastructure is the growing interest in the asset class from institutional investors worldwide. United States, ... [more]