Investment Magazine
 

WorkCover NSW makes investment changes

  • 1 February, 2006
  • 0
  • print

Skandia’s former CEO, Lars-Eric Petersson, was sentenced to a two-year jail term by a Swedish court last week for fiddling the company’s executive bonus scheme.

Skandia’s former CEO, Lars-Eric Petersson, was sentenced to a two-year jail term by a Swedish court last week for fiddling the company’s executive bonus scheme. According to a report on the Bloomsburg newswire, the Stockholm District Court found Petersson guilty of breach of trust and said he had “;abused his position of confidence the position of chief executive gave him”;. The court was also reported as saying that Skandia had suffered “;considerable damage”; and that Petersson had “;grossly abused his position.”; Petersson was fired by Skandia in 2003 after poor performance of its equity-linked savings schemes, that later led to an investigation of the lavish executive bonus scheme, which included houses and other lifestyle assets. As CEO Petersson had lifted the executive bonus cap without prior board approval, a move that Skandia estimated cost the company over $AU28 million. Skandia has also embarked on a private legal action to recover losses from Petersson. However, Petersson was found not guilty of illegally adding $AU6.7 million to his own company pension scheme because of a lack of evidence. An appeal by both or either parties against the verdict is expected, Bloomsburg reported. Meanwhile, further details about the integration between Skandia and Old Mutual are expected later next month after a meeting between top executives of the two companies and analysts. It is understood the discussions will include how Old Mutual’s Selestia investment platform will fit in with Skandia’s.

© Copyright: Whole articles from this website and newsletter cannot be reproduced without permission from the editor. If you wish to publish introductions to any article please ensure that it links to original content site www.investmentmagazine.com.au, and that it shows clear attribution to Investment Magazine, plus author name and date. Failure to abide by this request will be considered a breach of copyright and legal action will be taken.

Vote
Do you prefer the term non-affiliated or non-associated to independent board member?
 
in News

AustralianSuper wins Super Fund of the Year

The winners of the inaugural Chant West | Conexus Financial Super Fund Awards were announced last night in a ceremony at Ivy Ballroom ... [more]

Online service most highly rated

HESTA was the top-scoring fund in a survey of member-satisfaction levels carried out by CoreData Consulting, which has highlighted the need for more tailored ... [more]

Product important at Sunsuper

Sunsuper has boosted its product division, appointing three senior managers in newly created roles. The division, created last year to centralise the super ... [more]

ASIC strategy: targeted surveillance

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) will be taking a targeted surveillance approach to how superannuation funds undertake intra-fund advice, with particular ... [more]

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid ... [more]

Opposition to delay SG rise

The Coalition has said it will delay the increase of the super guarantee from 9 per cent to 12 per cent if it ... [more]